ABSTRACT
We present the case of a 77-year-old man with ischemic heart disease and baseline right bundle branch block having a well-tolerated and regular wide complex tachycardia with right bundle branch block morphology. A wide complex tachycardia (WCT) could be of supraventricular or ventricular origin. In this setting, we discuss the differential diagnosis of WCT, the usefulness and limitations of the diagnostic criteria for ventricular tachycardia.
Subject(s)
Tachycardia, Supraventricular , Tachycardia, Ventricular , Male , Humans , Aged , Bundle-Branch Block/diagnosis , Tachycardia, Supraventricular/diagnosis , Electrocardiography , Tachycardia, Ventricular/diagnosis , Heart Ventricles , Diagnosis, DifferentialABSTRACT
Background: Infective endocarditis is a life-threatening disease associated with high mortality. Appropriate antimicrobial treatment and cardiac surgery, when indicated, are closely related to prognosis. When cardiac surgery is contraindicated, prognosis worsens dramatically. There is few data concerning the use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement after healed aortic valve endocarditis or during active IE. We present the first case report of a transcatheter aortic valve replacement implanted during antimicrobial therapy for a severely symptomatic acute aortic regurgitation due to an infective endocarditis complicated with a perivalvular abscess. Case summary: A 68-year-old man was admitted due to left hemiparesis and fever. An acute ischaemic stroke with haemorrhagic transformation was diagnosed. Blood cultures were positive for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and a transoesophageal echocardiogram revealed an aortic endocarditis with an acute severe aortic regurgitation and a perivalvular abscess. Urgent cardiac surgery was contraindicated due to intracranial haemorrhage. However, the patient developed refractory pulmonary oedema and haemodynamic instability. Despite the perivalvular abscess, a transcatheter aortic valve replacement was successfully performed 15 days after the diagnosis. Nine months after completing antimicrobial therapy, there were no signs of relapse. Discussion: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement could be considered in selected patients with symptomatic severe aortic regurgitation due to aortic infective endocarditis during antimicrobial therapy when cardiac surgery is contraindicated.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Cases of myocarditis after COVID-19 messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines administration have been reported. Although the majority follow a mild course, fulminant presentations may occur. In these cases, cardiopulmonary support with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) may be needed. RESULTS: We present two cases supported with V-A ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock due to myocarditis secondary to a mRNA SARS-CoV2 vaccine. One of the cases was admitted for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. In both, a peripheral V-A ECMO was implanted in the cath lab using the Seldinger technique. An intra-aortic balloon pump was needed in one case for left ventricle unloading. Support could be successfully withdrawn in a mean of five days. No major bleeding or thrombosis complications occurred. Whereas an endomyocardial biopsy was performed in both, a definite microscopic diagnosis just could be reached in one of them. Treatment was the same, using 1000mg of methylprednisolone/day for three days. A cardiac magnetic resonance was performed ten days after admission, showing a significant improvement of the left ventricular ejection fraction and diffuse oedema and subepicardial contrast intake in different segments. Both cases were discharged fully recovered, with CPC 1. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 vaccine-associated fulminant myocarditis has a high morbidity and mortality but presents a high potential for recovery. V-A ECMO should be established in cases with refractory cardiogenic shock during the acute phase.
